SocialNet Cloud

Sep 07

What better way to socialize than your own world creation?
How To Build a World: The Basics | Geekdad from Wired.com

What better way to socialize than your own world creation?

How To Build a World: The Basics | Geekdad from Wired.com

Aug 18

via www.techcrunch.com

via www.techcrunch.com

Aug 17

It seems to me that in any company, large or small, you can divide the people into three broad categories. 1. The “Changers”. These are the people who use their work as a platform to “Change The World”. They go into a market and try to change it, in order to create something better, both for themselves and for the market at large. They can be the CEO or work in the mail room. Theirs is not a social position, it’s a psychological condition. 2. The “Contributors”. These are people who want to do their jobs, do it well, and get handsomely rewarded for it. They don’t necessarily see the need for “change” per se, they just want to see what works, and get it done. They want to find out who’s on the winning team, and get themselves a place on it. 3. The “Coasters”. They just want to turn up and get paid. Their lives and identities are outside their work- families, friends, hobbies etc- their job is just a means to an end; a way to pay for their “real lives” elsewhere. None of the three is necessarily better or worse than the others- we all have different needs, different agendas, different temperaments. We’ve all made different decisions about what kind of life we want to lead, what kind of compromises we’re willing to make, what kind of adventures we want to have. All roads exact their own unique toll. All choices come with a price. (via gapingvoid: “cartoons drawn on the back of business cards”
)

It seems to me that in any company, large or small, you can divide the people into three broad categories. 1. The “Changers”. These are the people who use their work as a platform to “Change The World”. They go into a market and try to change it, in order to create something better, both for themselves and for the market at large. They can be the CEO or work in the mail room. Theirs is not a social position, it’s a psychological condition. 2. The “Contributors”. These are people who want to do their jobs, do it well, and get handsomely rewarded for it. They don’t necessarily see the need for “change” per se, they just want to see what works, and get it done. They want to find out who’s on the winning team, and get themselves a place on it. 3. The “Coasters”. They just want to turn up and get paid. Their lives and identities are outside their work- families, friends, hobbies etc- their job is just a means to an end; a way to pay for their “real lives” elsewhere. None of the three is necessarily better or worse than the others- we all have different needs, different agendas, different temperaments. We’ve all made different decisions about what kind of life we want to lead, what kind of compromises we’re willing to make, what kind of adventures we want to have. All roads exact their own unique toll. All choices come with a price. (via gapingvoid: “cartoons drawn on the back of business cards”

)

sid05:
Map of connections between Web 2.0 companies and investors < life under electronic conditions

sid05:

Map of connections between Web 2.0 companies and investors < life under electronic conditions

Aug 13

This is why mobile devices will rule the market:

‘…We can make more money in mobile than we do in the desktop eventually… and the reason is the mobile computer is more targeted. Think about it: you carry your phone, and your phone knows all about you… we can do a very, very targeted ad. Over time we will make more money from mobile advertising… not now, but over time…’

” — Google CEO Schmidt: ‘We Can Make More Money In Mobile Than We Do On The Desktop’; Android This Year | mocoNews.net (via datainsightsideas)

Aug 10

“This simple premise holds the key to Twitter’s success: messages go to a well-defined audience. In the moment you release a tweet, you know who’s on the line and you have an idea of who can catch a glimpse of your message. @replies are the best illustration for this sense of audience: Even though Twitter is not a point-to-point message delivery system (let alone a reliable one), @replies are sent with the understanding that they will be read by the intended people because they are known to be in the audience. (Imagine a newspaper article that suddenly greeted a specific reader.)” — TechCrunch

“Over one billion cell phones have been sold worldwide in the last year, but in the US or Europe, the mobile Internet is still catching on relatively slowly. There even was a heated debate in the blogosphere just recently whether the mobile web has a future at all. However, this has never been a question in one specific region of the world: In Japan, since 2006 more people have been accessing the web through cell phones than through PCs. Is this a picture of things to come in other countries? Not necessarily. The interplay of five specific factors paved the way for the success of the mobile web in Japan (where I live) and largely explains why it hasn’t taken off yet elsewhere: * the ubiquity of advanced cell phones combined with a vast selection of tailor-made services * tech-savvy customers who often had their first web experience on a cell phone * a reliable technical infrastructure * symbiotic business relations between carriers and content providers * relatively sound regulatory policy” — TechCrunch

Jul 29

[video]

Jul 28

“the best company is one in which the employees are so engaged in their work that the company fades into the background” — Don’t ask employees to be passionate about the company! (via danw) (via datainsightsideas)

“Ivan and Abby Kirigin founded their startup, Tipjoy, to give consumers of free content a new way to pay for the stuff they really like: by leaving a tip. While the idea sounds simple enough, what the Kirigins want to do is actually far more ambitious than their quaint company name suggests. With Tipjoy they aim to exploit the commercial power of micropayments, a hip, Long Tail business concept in which consumers pay for things in tiny increments.” — Tipjoy’s Founders on Passing the Hat - GigaOM